AFP Denies Access to Social Media Surveillance Documents

 

A little while ago (5 months ago) I made a request under the Freedom of Information Act for the following documents.

(a) Documents, reports, memoranda or policy statements not already made publicly available, regarding the use of social media or social networking sites in formal police inquiries, surveillance and investigation.

(b) Documents not already made publicly available detailing any formal or informal co-operative arrangements between law enforcement agencies and any such social networking sites, detailing prices and/or procedures for such agencies seeking access to information or details regarding subscribers to those services.

It is without a doubt that there is a public interest and democratic imperative that such information be released. Internet users have a right to understand and be made aware of what information is being collected, under what circumstances and under what arrangements that information is being collected or relayed, and who has access to that information.

There were some 23 documents found to have existed within the AFP, that detailed the arrangements between the organisation and other social media orgs, namely Google/Youtube, Skype, Yahoo, Facebook, MySpace and Twitter.

Access to these files and documents was denied completely — it would damage the international relations of the Commonwealth, in that the documents have been provided to the AFP by foreign governments, and in addition any release would prejudice the investigative, preventative and detective operations of the AFP.

It’s obviously not the case that revealing the broad overarching relationships and arrangements between the AFP and social media orgs would impact to the great detriment the AFP are espousing in their correspondence, the US Courts have compelled the release of similar documents sought in FOIA requests by the EFF.

There are extremely novel ways in which policing organisations are assessing the large amounts of data they are retrieving from social media organisations, for instance through the mapping of associations which have huge implications for the privacy of citizens and users, and we should be able to understand how enforcement organisations are using that data, and for how long it is stored.

So off I go to the OAIC…again.

7 Comments

  1. Serkowski: AFP Denies Access to Social Media Surveillance Documents:   A little while ago (5 months ago) I mad… http://t.co/MJcJJfIs7O

  2. AFP denies access to all docs detailing formal and informal arrangements for the surveillance of social media || http://t.co/TGfal2vz3Q #foi

  3. Australian Federal Police denies @serkowski’s 5 month old FOI request for social media surveillance documents http://t.co/LD2g7JXqKB #PRISM

  4. FOI by @serkowski into Australian Federal Police use of social media data completely rejected http://t.co/Vw7lTI47tL

  5. Nice one. Thank you for what you’re doing with this! Good luck with the appeal. It will be interesting to see next steps…

  6. AFP denies FOI request on monitoring of Twitter: says “it would damage the international relations of the C’wth…” http://t.co/MU3fpN9tsi

  7. {australian Federal Police] Denies [FOI] Access to Social Media Surveillance Documents http://t.co/rdvFQ8mzwV

Leave a Reply

© 2017 Rodney Serkowski

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑